Prompt Systems — miaolay

01 / Beautiful scientific figures

Describe the scientific relationship before the style.

The builder below makes a prompt, not a figure. It keeps truth constraints in front of visual polish and never supplies data you did not give it.

Scientific subject

Figure form

Relationships that must remain true

Too clean organic42

Sparse dense28

Crisp atmospheric20

Generated working prompt

Before accepting the image

Do arrows encode a real relation, or merely decorate empty space?
Are highlights too uniform, making every object feel synthetic?
Has “cinematic” collapsed into an orange-and-blue filter?
Do texture and star size vary at more than one scale?
Are labels, values, uncertainty, and causal claims all supplied by the source?

02 / Remove AI voice

Protect the technical logic from the rewrite.

The objective is not to make every sentence plain. It is to remove language that claims more than the evidence while preserving symbols, quantities, citations, and the author’s actual judgement.

Original / synthetic example

Increasing the connection stiffness reduced the peak displacement in the three analysed cases.

Typical AI rewrite

It is worth noting that enhanced connection stiffness plays a pivotal role in effectively mitigating peak displacement, thereby highlighting its significant contribution to overall structural performance.

miaolay rewrite

Greater connection stiffness reduced the peak displacement in all three analysed cases.

Why

No “pivotal role,” no unsupported system-level claim, and no sentence that announces its own importance.

Editing system prompt

Edit the technical passage below without changing its technical logic.

Preserve exactly:
- quantities, symbols, variable names, units, citation placement, and stated uncertainty;
- the strength of every causal or comparative claim;
- distinctions between observation, interpretation, hypothesis, and conclusion.

Remove or question:
- previews of what the next section will say;
- “it is worth noting” and other importance claims with no information gain;
- unsupported words such as dominant, pivotal, comprehensive, robust, enabling, synergistic, or transformative;
- defensive sentences, repeated conclusions, and abstract-noun stacks;
- causal language that is stronger than the source.

Write the engineering fact first. Let the problem or implication follow naturally.

Return four parts:
1. Revised passage.
2. Material changes made.
3. Claims that require author verification.
4. Anything you intentionally did not rewrite because the technical meaning was ambiguous.

Passage:
[PASTE TEXT]

01
Do not preview the paper instead of saying the fact.
02
Put a citation immediately after the sentence it supports.
03
Do not strengthen causality to make the prose sound confident.
04
Do not replace precise verbs with abstract academic nouns.
05
When meaning is uncertain, ask; do not polish through it.

03 / Metaphysics & traditional time

Keep calculation, convention, and symbolism in separate layers.

These prompts are for cultural explanation and visual systems. They do not turn symbolic interpretation into a scientific law or a prediction about a person.

Symbolic-system prompt

Boundary: astronomy and clock correction can be calculated; calendar conventions can be documented; symbolic readings remain cultural interpretations. Never invent a birth chart, diagnose a person, or present fortune-telling as evidence.